Get Permission Soni, Soni, and Soni: Pre and post training study of awareness about biomedical waste management among health care personnel in medical college hospital in Western Rajasthan


Introduction

The term “biomedical waste” has been defined as “any waste that is generated during diagnosis, treatment or immunisation of human beings or animals, or in the research activities pertaining to or in the production or testing of biological and includes categories mentioned in schedule I of the Government of India’s Biomedical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules 1998”1 With the increasing health care facilities and increased generation of biomedical waste, its proper management has become a burning issue. Biomedical waste if not managed properly can spread highly contagious diseases and damage the environment.2

The average waste generation rates of 0.5 kg to 2 kg per bed per day and it is estimated that annually about 0.33 million tons of hospital waste is generated in India in this, 10-25% of the healthcare waste generated is hazardous & causes serious health problems.3

Inadequate biomedical waste management not only poses significant risk of infection due to pathogens like HIV, Hepatitis B & C virus but also carries the risk of water, air & soil pollution thereby adversely affecting the environment and community at large.4

Improper management of biomedical waste poses a serious threat to human health and may lead to various health hazards like transmission of diseases, not only to health workers, but also to patients and their attendants visiting the health centres.

Therefore, the Ministry of Environment and Forests has promulgated the Bio-Medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998 for proper management of Bio-Medical waste.5

The purpose of BMW management is to ensure its proper collection, handling, as well as safe disposal. Health care personnel are expected to have knowledge regarding proper segregation and disposal of BMW. Due to improper biomedical waste management and lack of awareness and inadequate knowledge, health centres now a days are becoming a hub for spreading infections , therefore this present study was done.

Materials and Methods

This was an observational, descriptive, hospital based, cross sectional study which was conducted in our institution in the month of March, April and May 2020. Ethical clearance was taken from Institute Ethics Committee. The study group comprised of healthcare personnel that were doctors, nurses, laboratory technicians and Class IV employees after taking their consent. Participants who didn’t give consent to participate were excluded from the study. A predesigned questionnaire having 20 questions was designed to obtain information about awareness and knowledge of BM waste generation and waste management practices. These questions were about biomedical waste generation, proper segregation, transportation, disposal, treatment, health hazards and legislation, waste management practices, attitude assessment and sharp waste injuries. The answers were checked and marks were given and this data was complied and analysed into a work sheet on Microsoft excel sheet using software SPSS 20 version. Proportions and percentage were used to interpret the result

Results and interpretation

A total of 250 participants (50 doctors, 140 nurses, 30 lab technicians and 30 class IV employees) took part in the study. Table 1 shows pre and post training knowledge of various health personnel regarding BMW management. Improvement in Knowledge and awareness, post training about bio medical waste handling and management is also presented in bar diagram’s in Figure 1,2,3,4 of doctors, nurses, lab technicians and class IV employees respectively. The questions were, whether they heard of BMW, details about categories of BMW, awareness of bio hazard symbol, any health hazard of BMW, disease transmitted by BMW, knowledge about color coding of BMW management bags, received any training for BMWM, and aware about waste management team, etc .

The overall, Improvement in knowledge was satisfactory and was highest among doctors (60-70%) before training and (90-100 %) after training, followed by nurses (50-60%) before training and (80-90 %) after training ; lab technicians (30-40%) before training and (75-85 %) after training; class IV employees (20-30%) before training and (60-70 %) after training .

Knowledge regarding pre-treatment of highly infectious waste , use of personal protective measures for handling, spill management, management of liquid bio medical waste, proper storage facility for collecting BMW, bar coding of BMW, previously attended training on BMWM was not enough among all the categories.

Table 1

Distribution of health care personnel onawerness regarding bio-medical waste management. (N=250)

Doctor(n=50) Nurses(n=140) Lab technician(n=30) Class 4 employees (n= 30)
Pre training Post training Pre training Post training Pre training Post training Pre training Post training
1.Primary source of BMW 35 (70) 48 (96) 90 (64) 125 (89) 10 (33) 25 (83) 5 (16) 20 (67)
2.BMW management rules 30 (60) 50 (100) 70 (50) 130 (93) 5 (16) 25 (83) 2 (6) 20 (67)
3.Knowledge of different BMW categories 2016 30 (60) 50 (100) 50 (36) 140 (100) 10 (33) 28 (93) 0 (0) 20 (67)
4.Colour coding of containers 40 (80) 50 (100) 120 (86) 140 (100) 10 (33) 28 (93) 6 (20) 25 (83)
5.Segregation of biomedical waste at source 35 (70) 50 (100) 80 (57) 130 (93) 8 (27) 25 (83) 6 (20) 22 (73)
6.BMW disposal 30 (60) 45 (90) 70 (50) 120 (86) 5 (16) 23 (76) 7 (27) 20 (67)
7.BMW Storage 25 (50) 45 (90) 60 (43) 130 (93) 7 (23) 26 (86) 8 (27) 20 (67)
8.Biohazard symbol 50 (100) 50 (100) 140 (100) 140 (100) 25 (83) 30 (100) 8 (27) 28 (93)
9.Universal precautions 40 (80) 48 (96) 90 (64.2) 135 (96) 20 (67) 25 (83) 10 (33) 24 (80)
10.Diseases transmitted by BMW 40 (80) 50 (100) 70 (50) 130 (93) 15 (50) 29 (96) 0 (0) 20 (67)
11.Hepatitis b vaccination status 45 (90) 50 (100) 80 (57) 140 (100) 18 (60) 30 (100) 4 (13) 22 (73)
12.Sharp waste disposal 35 (70) 48 (96) 80 (57) 130 (93) 20 (67) 30 (100) 6 (20) 25 (83)
13. BMW management is a team work 40 (80) 50 (100) 110 (78) 140 (100) 15 (50) 30 (100) 5 (16) 23 (76)
14.Bar coding/ labeling of BMW 30 (60) 50 (100) 40 (28) 130 (93) 5 (16) 25 (83) 2 (6) 24 (80)
15. Pre treatment of highly infectious waste 25 (50) 40 (80) 20 (14) 130 (93) 4 (13) 26 (86) 0 (0) 20 (67)
16.Liquid bio medical waste management 25 (50) 45 (90) 20 (14) 120 (86) 6 (20) 26 (86) 2 (6) 15 (50)
17. Safe method of transportation 38 (76) 45 (90) 50 (36) 135 (96) 12 (40) 22 (73) 8 (27) 26 (86)
18. Use of PPE while handling BMW 45 (90) 50 (100) 70 (50) 125 (89) 10 (33) 24 (80) 7 (23) 26 (86)
19.Treatment of BMW 30 (60) 48 (96) 30 (21) 125 (89) 6 (20) 26 (86) 2 (6) 22 (73)
20.Spill management 30 (60) 48 (96) 40 (28) 135 (96) 12 (40) 26 (86) 0 (0) 20 (67)
Figure 1

Awareness among Doctors about Bio medical waste management before and after training

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/f050a9e1-9072-44d3-b252-df2d45199bdcimage1.png
Figure 2

Awareness among Nurses about Bio medical waste management before and after training

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/f050a9e1-9072-44d3-b252-df2d45199bdcimage2.png
Figure 3

Awarenessamong Lab Technicians about Bio medical waste management before and after training

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/f050a9e1-9072-44d3-b252-df2d45199bdcimage3.png
Figure 4

Awareness among class IV employees about Bio medical waste management before and after training

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/f050a9e1-9072-44d3-b252-df2d45199bdcimage4.png

Discussions

Most of the Doctors had satisfactory knowledge (60-70%) about BMW management. This can be credited to the due their regular dealing with BMW and may be due to the topic in the MBBS curriculum. The knowledge of nursing staff was appreciable and similar reasons can be attributed to this (50-60%). Unfortunately, only 30-40% lab technicians as well as 20-30% class IV employees had proper knowledge. The results were similar to results of Verma et al.6

The present study findings are in agreement with other study Yadavannavar et al.7 and study done by Bala et al. 8 This study showed poor knowledge among lab technicians and class IV employees may be due to, most of them are on contract basis and were not as much as fortunate to get repeated training compared to doctors and nursing staff. Though overall knowledge of study participants was good after training but there is still a need of regular good quality training to improve their current knowledge about BMW and especially main emphasis should be focused on training of lab technicians and sanitary workers at regular time interval also discussed in study done by Mathur et al8 and Kishore et al.9 Anand P et al.10

Practical knowledge regarding pre-treatment of highly infectious waste, use of personal protective measures for handling, spill management, management of liquid bio medical waste, proper storage facility for collecting BMW, bar coding of BMWwas not enough among all the categories as these aspects are recently introduced in practices.

It can be well judged from the results that practice score of BMWM was mostly satisfactory in doctors (80%), nursing staff (70%) but not among lab technician (50%) and class IV employees (30%), Similar results were seen in the study of Sachan et al.,2 and Bhatt et al.11

Knowledge regarding BMW management among doctors, nurses and lab technicians was found to be satisfactory as compared to class IV employees, also reported in previous studies.12, 13, 14, 15, 16 This low standard of knowledge regarding BMW management among class IV employees may be due to the lack of any formal training to them due to contract type of services.

Conclusion

The study showed good awareness among doctors, nursing staff but poor in lab technician and sanitary workers before training. Based on the observation, the importance of training regarding bio medical waste management can’t be overemphasized as there is very good improvement in knowledge and awareness after training so induction training of newer health care personnel and continuous in-service training programs and periodically evolution of the health care personnel is required.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

National Guidelines on Hospital Waste Management Based upon the Bio-Medical Waste (Management and Handling) RulesMoHFWNew Delhi1998

2 

R Sachan M L Patel A Nischal Assessment of the knowledge, attitude and practices regarding biomedical waste management amongst the medical and paramedical staff in tertiary health care centreIntern J Sci Res Pub20122716

3 

A D Patil A V Sekhdar Health- Care Waste Management in IndiaJ Environ Manage20016321120

4 

Safe management of waste from health care activities. WHO, Geneva. 1999. 5. Central pollution control board. Environmental standard and guidelines for management of hospital waste. CPCB, Ministry of Environment and ForestNew Delhi1996

5 

Ministry of Environment and Forests. Notification of Bio-Medical Waste (Management & Handling) Rules1998

6 

R Verma K Bhalla S Chawla Knowledge regarding biomedical waste management among health functionaries of a rural block of HaryanaInt J Geological Earth Environ Sci2014431459

7 

A S Berad P B Jagirdar M C Yadavannavar Biomedical waste management: A study of knowledge, attitude, and practices in a tertiary health care institution in BijapurIndian J Comm Med20103511723

8 

V Mathur M A Hassan S Dwivedi R P Misra Knowledge, attitude, and practices about biomedical waste management among healthcare personnel: A cross-sectional studyIndian J Comm Med20113621435

9 

J Kishore P Goel B Sagar T K Joshi Awareness about biomedical waste management and infection control among dentists of a teaching hospitalIndian J Dent Res200011115761

10 

Puneet Anand Rakhi Jain Anuj Dhyani Knowledge, attitude and practice of biomedical waste management among health care personnel in a teaching institution in Haryana, IndiaInt J Res Med Sci20164424650

11 

S Bhatt M Kohli K Patel A Shah P Gupta Evaluation of awareness regarding biomedical waste management in institute of ophthalmologyNational J Integr Res Med201341325

12 

N B Pandit H K Mehta G P Kartha S K Choudhary Management of bio-medical waste: Awareness and practices in a district of GujaratIndian J Pub Health2005492457

13 

A Malini B Eshwar Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Biomedical waste management among health care personnel in a tertiary care hospital in Puducherry.Int J Biomed Res2015631726

14 

S Saini S S Nagarajan R K Sarma Knowledge; attitude and practices of bio-medical waste management amongst staff of a tertiary level hospital in IndiaJ Acad Hosp Adm2005172

15 

M Shafee N B Kasturwar N Nirupama Study of knowledge, attitude and practices regarding biomedical waste among paramedical workersIndian J Comm Med201035236970

16 

G Singh P Gupta R Kumari S Verma Knowledge Attitude and practices regarding biomedical waste management among healthcare personnel in Lucknow IndiaIndian J Clin Pract20142498303



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmmtd.2020.039


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 1862

PDF Downloaded: 745