Get Permission Junaid, Singh, Farooq, Sharma, Sharma, and Ahmad: Bacterial profile of diabetic foot infection in a tertiary care centre


Introduction

Diabetes mellitus is such a metabolic disarranged which is categorized by manifold long term issues that impact virtually each and every system in the human body. Foot difficulties are usual in those patients who are infected by diabetes and are observed one of the most exorbitant diabetes problems to cure. In advanced nations, diabetic foots are one of the most dangerous and common drawbacks of diabetes. The most obstacles of diabetes mellitus are also a type of neuropathy and foot ulcers materialization of complication reach from uncomplicated to tortuous, including limbs cut off and life frightening infection. 1

Nearly 20% of hospital admissions among patients with diabetes mellitus and the conclusion of diabetic foot infections have been guessed. In fact diabetic foot ulcers can conduct to infections, gangrene, amputation and even dying if required supervision is not served. Association of American diabetes has guided that a protection care group interpreted as a interdisciplinary squad can reduce the risks related with diabetic foot infections and cleave by 50%-85%. 2

Diabetes mellitus is a major cause of last stage which can destroy the kidneys due to diabetes mellitus, armature feels blindness, and occasionally the lower limbs of patients are disconnected without injury in such case. Amputations are resulting from other atherosclerosis of the arteries. China is at the first rank which has a load of diabetes in the whole world whereas India is the second biggest contributor of diabetic patients. In proportion to the world wide working squad on the diabetic foot (IWGDF-INTERNATIONAL WORKING GROUP DIABETIC FOOT), diabetic foot infection is a full opacity injury pierce through the dermis which is detected below the ankle in a diabetic foot. 3

Ethics approval

Ethics approval was obtained from TMMC Moradabad institutional Ethics Committee (TMMC-IEC) Ref no- TMMC & RC.

Materials and Methods

Specimen collection and transport

Specimens for microbiological assessment were obtained at the time of admission and at the time of visit to OPD, after through vigorous saline wash followed by wound debridement of superficial slough and exudates. Specimens were collected by scraping the ulcer base or the deeper portion of the wound edge with sterile curette into a wide-mouthed sterile container or scavenged using sterile swabs and transported to the microbiology lab without undue delay.

Specimen processing

Direct smear are made from the specimens, gram staining was done and examined under oil immersion for the presence of pus cells, epithelial cells and bacteria and to asses quality of the sample. 4, 5

Inclusion criteria

Patients with history of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

  1. Admitted in surgical and medicine wards for diabetic foot ulcers.

  2. Attending surgery OPD for DFU/DFI.

The patients of all age groups belonging to the both sex with DFI/DFU with or without systemic signs and symptoms of infection were considered and included in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Foot ulcers and foot infection in patients without diabetes.

  2. Patients who had received antibiotics (oral, topical, injection) with in the previous week.

  3. Patients who deny the consent.

Antimicrobial sensitivity testing 6

By using the modified Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method, in accordance with the CLSI guidelines, using antibiotic discs, all isolates were tested for antibacterial susceptibility in Muller Hinton agar.

Inoculation of Mullen Hinton agar plates as per CLSI guidelines 6

Within 15 minutes after adjusting the turbidity of the inoculums, dip a sterile cotton swab into the inoculums and press it tightly on the side wall of the test tube to drain the excess broth. The Muller Hinton agar plate was inoculated by scratching the swab twice on the surface of the intestinal sterile agar and rotating the plate at an angle of approximately 600°C to ensure uniform distribution of the inoculums. The edges of the agar are wiped in a circular motion. Leave the closed board for 3-5 minutes to absorb any excess surface moisture before applying the antibacterial sheet.

Application of antimicrobial discs

The battery of drugs to be applied is determined and the following antimicrobial discs- Gentamicin, Amikacin, Amoxycillin, Ampicillin, Amoxyclav, Oxacillin, Erythromycin, Cotrimaxazole, doxycycline, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, cephelexin, Cefixime, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, cefipime, ceftazidime, clavulanicacid, aztreonam, imipenam and are tested for all isolates.

In addition to the above drugs, azithromycin and vancomycin were also tested for Gram-positive cocci. Piperacillin-tazobactam is only used for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella and Pseudomonas. Place the disc on the agar plate with thumb pliers and gently press down to ensure complete contact with the agar surface. The use of the disc should ensure that the minimum distance from the center of the disc to the center of the disc is 25 mm. The plates are then incubated at 370 for 16 – 18 hrs in ambient air. Control strains are also inoculated following the same procedure.

Interpretation

After the stipulated period of incubation, the plates are examined under good light. Satisfactory streaking is confirmed by semi confluent lawn of growth and uniform circular zones of inhibition. Measure the area completely depressed from the center of the disc. Use the area ruler to measure the area to the nearest millimeter. The petri dish is fixed a few inches above a black non-reflective background, which is illuminated with reflected light. The area of ​​inhibition is the edge where the growth is not visible with the naked eye, and is explained with reference to the CLSI standard guidelines updated from time to time. The organism is reported as sensitive or resistant to the drugs that are tested. An intermediated zone of inhibition is also reported but the clinical application of the data is doubtful. Control plates were also read using the same procedure and reliability of the test is ensured.

Observation & Result

A total of 82 samples were collected. These samples came from 82 DFI/DFU patients in the Department of Surgery and patients admitted to TMMC&RC in MORADABAD. A total of 82 samples were processed in the microbiology laboratory of TMMC&RC. In the general population, there were 50 cases of diabetic foot infections in men (60.98%) and 32 cases in women (39.02%). 64 (78%) showed significant growth, while 18 (22%) showed no biological growth.

A total of 87 species of organisms were produced from 64 samples after processing. A total of 87 species of organisms were produced from 64 samples after processing. Microbial isolation is the cause of single microbial growth in 47 (73.43%) samples, while 17 (26.57%) samples show the cause of polymicrobial growth.

Figure 1

Isolated organisms

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/08e7575b-88e1-4dac-84ac-19228db74632image1.png

The following organisms were isolated from 82 samples and 64 positive cultures to be studied. In our study Gram negative organisms 52(59.78%) were more predominant pathogens than gram positive organisms 35(40.22%). Staphylococcus aureus – 23 (26.43%), Pseudomonas spp- 18 (20.22%), Proteus Spp- 9 (10.34%), Klebsiella spp- 14 (16.09%), Escherichia coli- 11(12.64%), corynebacterium spp- 2(2.23%), CONS- 3(3.44%), Enterocoocus spp-7(8.04%).

Discussion

Diabetic foot infections are major health problem in individuals which might require intensive care by health professionals. This research was carried out at TMMC&RC MORADABAD December 2019 to October 2020. After participants understood the procedure and gave consent, Pus swabs was obtained from 82 cases having lesion secondary to DM. 60.98% constitutes male population, the remaining 39.02% being the female population. Older population falling in the age group of 51-70 years contributes the majority (65.86%) of the disease undergoing treatment for diabetic foot infections in TMMC&RC, Moradabad.

Age DMs variety affects immunity of individual making them susceptible to occurrence of lesions. This may be attributed to lesser survival rate among above 70 year age group in our country which in turn put the blame on socioeconomic factors.

We found 73.57% positive growth out of total 82 samples that is very high in numbers as compare to Zubair M et al, 7 Anandi C et al, 8 Kant R et al 9 or Citron D M et al. 10 Monomicrobial growth was 73.43% in this study when we compare to studies of Zubair M et al, 7 Anandi C et al 8 they observed 56.6%, 19%, 23% of monomicrobial identification. Study of Pappu k et al 11 observed that 92% growth of monomicrobial in that study which is same as the finding of our result. The most common combinations that were isolated in this study were P.aureuginosa with E.coli then E.coli and Staph. aureus.

Commonest bacteria are gram gram negative (55.18%) after that gram positive bacteria (44.82%) in this study which show commons with the findings of pappu k et al, 11 Patahare NA et al.12 other studies of Mantey I et al;13 Dang CN et al,14 find that gram positive organisms are main cause in these study. These studies show better distribution of population according to age or sex and also show the difference of finding and reasons for differences.

Conclusion

In this study we found that male patients are more affected than female from diabetic foot infections. Male patients were 50 patients and female patients were 32 patients. Mainly gram negative bacteria are predominant pathogens as compare to gram positive organism. Gram negative organism were 52 (59.78%) isolated and gram negative organisms 35 (40.22%) isolated out of 64 samples which were affected from diabetic foot infections.

To conclude Staphylococcus aureus (26.43%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (20.22%), Klebsiella spp. 16.09% and Escherichia coli (12.64%) these organisms are more frequent in our study. In this study we observe that vancomycin, linezolid and colistin are the most susceptible drugs.

Acknowledgment

I would like to thanks entire Microbiology department, TMMC & RC for their guidance and cooperative behavior.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.

Source of Funding

None.

References

1 

T G Mariam A Alemayehu E Tesfaye W Mequannt K K Temesgen M A Limenih Prevalence of Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Associated Factors among Adult Diabetic Patients Who Attend the Diabetic Follow-Up Clinic at the University of Gondar Referral HospitalJ Diabet Res20165246

2 

L Yazdanpanah M Nasiri S Adarvishi Literature review on the management of diabetic foot ulcerWorld J Diab2015613753

3 

S S Amjad J Zafar N Shams Bacteriology of diabetic foot in tertiary care hospital; Frequency , Antibiotic susceptibility and risk factorsNatl Libr Med201729223440

4 

J T Raymakers A J Houben J J Van Der Heyden J H Tordoir P J Kitslaar N C Schaper The effect of diabetes and severe ischaemia on the penetration of ceftazidime into tissues of the limbDiabet Med200118322934

5 

D Baird J G Collee A G Fraser B P Marmion A Simmons Staphylococcus: cluster-forming gram-positive cocciMackie & McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology. 14th Edn.New York, Churchill Livingstone199624561

6 

V L Sutter D M Citron Mac Edelstein S M Finegold Wadsworth Anaerobic Bacteriology Manual. 4th Edn.35Star PublishingBelmont, CA1985529560

7 

M Zubair A Malik J Ahmad Clinico-bacteriology and risk factors for the diabetic foot infection with multidrug resistant microorganisms in North IndiaBiol Med2010242234

8 

C Anandi D Alaguraja V Natarajan Bacteriology of diabetic foot lesionsIndian J Med Microbiol20042231758

9 

P Ramakant A K Verma R Misra K N Prasad Changing Microbiological Profile of pathogenic Bacteria in diabetic foot infection: time to rethink on which empirical therapy to chose?Diabetologica20115415864

10 

D M Citron Ejc Goldstein V C Merriam B A Lipsky Bacteriology of moderate to severe diabetic foot infections and in-vitro activity of antimicrobial agentsJ Clin Microbiol2007459281928

11 

A K Pappu A Sinha A Johnson Microbiological profile of diabetic foot ulcerCalicut Mede J20119314

12 

N A Pathare S R Sathe Antibiotic combination in polymicrobial diabetic foot infectionsIndian J Med Sci200155465562

13 

I Mantey R L Hill A V Foster S Welson J J Wade M E Edmonds Infection with foot ulcers with Staphylococcus aureus associated with increased mortality in diabetic patientsCommune Dis Public Health20003428890

14 

C N Dang Y D Prasad A J Boulton E B Jude Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the diabetic foot clinic: a worsening problemDiabet Med2003203159161



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 03-08-2021

Accepted : 18-08-2021


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmmtd.2022.011


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 873

PDF Downloaded: 336