Get Permission Sajjanar, Premalatha DE, Siddesh KC, and Prakash N: Study of bacteriological profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of pus isolates in tertiary care hospital


Introduction

Wound causes exposure of underlying subcutaneous tissue to pathogenic microorganisms which can be either monomicrobial or polymicrobial. Wound can be clean, clean contaminated, contaminated, dirty This causes pus formation which is yellow, white colour which consists of WBC’s which are dead, cellular debris, necrotic tissues. Pus can be PATOS (present at time of surgery) or pus can be seen in patient who had surgery within past 30 days or 90 days with implants. Surgical site infections(post-operative wound infections) leading to nosocomial infections and skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) due to trauma, burn injuries contribute to morbidity and mortality of the patient.1, 2 Immunocompromised conditions like diabetes mellitus, patient on corticosteroids, chemotherapy undergoing patients where invasion and survival of pathogens causes wound infection and delayed wound healing. pus appearance in the post-operative wound itself contribute as important factor of infection.2, 3 These may be endogenous or exogenous or it may be polymicrobial or monomicrobial in nature. Both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria have been found in hospital acquired infections, especially postoperative wound infections. Pseudmonas aeruginosa is the most common organism isolated in burn patients.3 Most common organisms causing pyogenic infection includes gram positive cocci such as Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus spp and gram negative bacilli such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella spp, E. coli. 2, 3 Healthcare associated infections (HAI) prevention of SSI is by implementation of infection control practices in the hospitals. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of microorganisms isolated from pus sample vary from one geographical area to another geographical area. Therefore the choice of antibiotic for empirical therapy should be based on the local antibiotic susceptibility pattern. Various strategies must be implemented for rationalizing the use of antibiotics in hospital routinely and minimize the emergence of multidrug resistant bacteria among the pus isolates and prevent the risk of global public health problem.2, 3

Materials and Methods

A cross-sectional prospective study was conducted at Department of microbiology, Shimoga institute of medical sciences, Shimoga from January 2018 to June 2018 for duration of 6 months. All pus samples of inpatient department (IPD) and outpatient department (OPD) were included in the study.

Pus sample collection: Under aseptic precautions the pus specimens were collected in sterile swabs or by aspiration of pus in sterile syringes and sample transported to the microbiology laboratory. Two sterile cotton swabs of pus sample collected for each patient. One sterile cotton swab was used to perform gram stain smear another pus swab was sent for culture. All pus samples were processed on MacConkey agar, blood agar, chocolate agar and incubated at 37°c under aerobic conditions for 24 hours. Identification of the bacterial colony followed by gram stain smear and subjecting the culture growth for, biochemical reactions as per standard conventional microbiological methods.4, 5 The antimicrobial susceptibility tests were done by Kirby–Bauer’s Disk Diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton Agar using bacterial suspensions matched with McFarland Standard and interpreted as per clinical laboratory standard institution guidelines (CLSI). 5, 6

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antibiotic susceptibility testing was carried out by Kirby Bauer Disk Diffusion method. Antibiotics discs used are Ampicillin (Amp)-10µg, amoxyclav (20/10µg), gentamicin (10μg), amikacin (30μg), ciprofloxacin (5μg), Levofloxacin (5μg) ceftazidime (30μg), Cefotaxime (30μg), Ampicillin sulbactam (20µg), Aztreonam (10μg) Imipenem (10μg) and Piperacillin – Tazobactum (100/10µg). Azithromycin (30μg), Cefoxitin ((30μg), Doxycycline (30μg) Cotrimoxazole (1.25μg /23.75μg), Erythromycin (5µg), Clindamycin (2µg), Linezolid (30µg), Vancomycin (30µg). 6

Result

The present study was conducted at Department of microbiology, Shimoga institute of medical sciences, Shimoga from January 2018 to June 2018. Out of 350 samples 250 were culture positive 100 were culture negative. Most common organism isolated was followed by Staphylococcus aureus 86(34.45%), Klebsiella spp 72(28.8%), Pseudomonas Aeruginosa 55(22%), E.Coli 20(8%), CoNS 9(3.6%), Proteus spp 2(0.8%), Enterococcus spp 3(1.2%) Acinetobacter spp 3 (1.2%), Citrobacter spp 3(1.2%).

Among gram negative organisms Klebsiella spp was highly sensitive to Aztreonam (88%), Amikacin (78%), Gentamicin (64.6%) and least sensitive to Ciprofloxacin (9.4%), Levofloxacin (9.4%), Piperacillin-tazobactam (10.4%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was highly sensitive to Piperacillin-Tazobactam (86.6%), Amikacin (75.8%), Imipenem (66.4%) and least sensitive to Ampicillin-sulbactam (6.2%), Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (10.2%), Levofloxacin (18.5%). Among gram positive organisms Staphylococcus aureus was highly sensitive to Linezolid (100%), Vancomycin (100%), Doxycycline (68.4%), Cotrimoxazole (66.6%) and least sensitive to Cefoxitin ((28.6%)), Erythromycin (10.5%), Azithromycin (15.5%). Coagulase negative staphylococcus (CoNS) was highly sensitive to Linezolid (100%), Vancomycin (100%), Cotrimoxazole (68%) least sensitive to Erythromycin (18%), Azithromycin (25.5%). Cefoxitin ((32%)

Figure 1

Culture positive and Culture negative pus samples

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/4ea6f3b0-a191-4090-981c-b2099bf50a58image1.png

Figure 2

Bacteriological profile of pus samples

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/d3b3514d-721b-4a06-9e1f-8279202fa094/image/ae3cea04-91ef-4369-8604-39503319ad72-u2-copy.png

Table 1

Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of gram negative organisms isolated from pus specimens

Klebsiella spp (%)

Pseudomonas spp (%)

E. coli (%)

Proteus spp (%)

Acinetobacter spp (%)

Imipenem

-

66.4

88.4

100

100

Piperacillin-tazobactam

10.4

86.6

32.6

100

100

Gentamicin

64.6

10.8

78.8

100

100

Ampicillin sulbactam

-

6.2

22.7

0

33.33

Aztreonam

88

44.8

45.5

66.6

100

Ciprofloxacin

9.4

36.6

31.6

66.6

33.33

Levofloacin

9.4

18.5

16.4

0

0

Amikacin

78

75.8

66.3

100

100

Cotrimoxazole

48.4

25.5

74.3

100

100

Cefotaxim

46

43.6

49.8

100

100

Amoxyclavulanic acid

4.7

10.2

22.7

33.3

33.33

Ceftazidime

23.4

26.7

35.5

66.66

100

Table 2

S. aureus

CONS

Enterococcus spp

Linezolid

100

100

100

Vancomycin

100

100

100

Clindamycin

52.4

66

-

Erythromycin

10.5

18

-

Azithromycin

15.5

25.5

-

Cefoxitin

28.6

32

-

Cotrimoxazole

66.6

68

-

Doxycycline

68.4

58.3

-

Gentamycin

63.4

60.6

0

Ampicillin

10.45

11

0

Discussion

According to our study most common organism isolated was Staphylococcus aureus 86(34.45%) followed by, Klebsiella spp 72(28.8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa 55(22%), E. coli 20(8%), CoNS 9(3.6%). Similar study done by Jamatia et al shows Staphylococcus aureus (30.11%) followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (21.02%), Klebsiella spp. (17.03%), E. coli (13.63%), Proteus spp. (6.25%). 7 Similar study done by murugesan et al.,(2017) bacteriological profile shows Staphylococcus aureus (66.41%), Klebsiella species (22.13%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11.15%) 8 Study done by Kumar et al.,(2017) shows Staphylococcus aureus (47.55%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=101, 35.31%), Klebsiella spp (n=35, 12.23%) and E. coli (n=14, 4.89%)9 Most commonest causative agent of skin and soft tissue infections is Staphylococcus aureus. According to our study Staphylococcus aureus was highly sensitive to Linezolid (100%), Vancomycin (100%) and least sensitive to Cefoxitin ((28.6%)), Erythromycin (10.5%), Azithromycin (15.5%). Similar study done by Murugesan et al showed Staphylococcus aureus highly sensitivetio Vancomycin (94.25%), Cloxacillin (70.11%) and resistance towards Erythromycin (55%) and Methicillin (25%).8 Similar study done by Kumar et al.,(2017) shows high sensitivity to linezolid (91.17%) Vancomycin (79.41%) and methicillin resistance (38.23%). 9 Similar study done by Mohanty et al shows methicillin resistance 38.56% and study by Singh et al shows methicillin resistance 45%.10, 11 Similar study done by Rai et el.,(2012) shows high sensitivity for Cefoxitin (81%), Gentamicin (76%), Erythromycin (72%) when compared to our study.12 Study by Khanam et al shows high antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to penicillin (84.5% to penicillin and 63.6% to ampicillin) 13 Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is important hospital acquired infection (HAI) and MRSA outbreak contributes to mortality and morbidity. In our study Klebsiella spp was highly sensitive to Aztreonam (88%), Amikacin (78%), Gentamicin (64.6%) and least sensitive to Ciprofloxacin (9.4%), Levofloxacin(9.4%), Piperacillin-tazobactam (10.4%). Study by Gomatheswari et al shows high sensitivity to Imipenem (83%) followed by Amikacin (68%) and high resistance to Ampicillin(83%), Ceftazidime-clavulanic acid (58%). 14 Similar study done by Jamatia et al shows Klebsiella spp highest resistance to Penicillin (100%), Amoxicillin (100%), Amoxiclavulanic acid(100%). 7 In our study Pseudomonas aeruginosa was highly sensitive to Piperacillin-Tazobactam (86.6%), Amikacin (75.8%), Imipenem (66.4%) and least sensitive to Ampicillin-sulbactam (6.2%), Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (10.2%), Levofloxacin (18.5%). Similar study done by Kumar et al high sensitivity was seen in Amikacin (90%), Gentamicin (88%) Levofloxacin (71%), Ciprofloxacin (62%) and least sensitive to Cefotaxime (92%), Cloxacillin (90%), Ampicillin (58%).9 Similar study by Kanam et al showed Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14%) as commonest organism isolated and highest rate of susceptibility was seen toward cefuroxime (87.5%), followed by Cefaridine (62.5%). Study by Rai et al shows Highest rate of susceptibility was toward ciprofloxacin (51%), followed by tobramycin (44%) Pseudomonas aeruginosa is opportunistic nosocomial pathogen and commonest organism isolated froms burns patients. According to our study Coagulase negative staphylococcus (CoNS) was highly sensitive to Linezolid (100%), Vancomycin (100%), Cotrimoxazole (68%) least sensitive to Erythromycin (18%), Azithromycin (25.5%). Cefoxitin ((32%). Similar study done by Bora et al shows isolation of Staphylococcus epidermidis (46.6%), Staphylococcus hemolyticus 42.3%. Staphylococcus epidermidis shows high degree of resistance to penicillin (97%), oxacillin (64.7%) and high sensitivity to Linezolid (100%), Vancomycin (100%).15 MRCoNS is important agent of hospital acquired infection which has potential to transfer resistance mechanism to Staphylococcus aureus present on skin and hospital settings. 15, 16

Conclusion

Majority of pus samples showed the isolation of more than one microorganism (polymicrobial) which results delay in wound healing. Staphylococcus aures is the most common organism isolated from pus samples and is important etiology of healthcare associated infections (HAI) mainly surgical site infections (SSI). Infection control practices like pre-operative screening for carriers, Decoloniztion with mupirocin ointment for Staphylococcus aureus carriers undergoing surgeries, surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis 120min prior to the surgery, Peri-operatively surgical site skin preparation, hand scrub before and in between cases, post operatively surgical dressing, hand hygiene to be followed to prevent the delayed wound healing and also to prevent healthcare associated infections. Most of the organisms showed multiple antibiotic resistance due to extended spectrum beta lactamases. Strategies for rationale use of antibiotics to be followed to prevent the emergence of multidrug resistant bacteria among the pus isolates and to reduce morbidity and mortality.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

JA Freiberg The mythos of laudable pus along with an explanation for its originJ Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect20171331968

2 

N Bankar A Wankhade RB Bramhane R Hathiwala DH Chandi Bacteriological Profile of pus/ wound swab and antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from pus & wound swab of Indoor Patients of Tertiary Care HospitalInt J Innov Res Med Sci201834197680

3 

WWC Topley SGS Wilson Topley and Wilson′s Microbiology and Microbial Infections: 8 Volume10th Edn.Wiley–Blackwell2007

4 

W Winn AS Janda W Koneman E Procop G Schreckenberger P Woods Koneman’s color atlas and textbook of diagnostic MicrobiologyPhiladelphiaLippincott, New York20061443535

5 

JG Collee W Marr JG Collee AG Fraser BP Marmion A Simmons Culture of bacteriaMackie and McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology. 14 edn.Churchill LivingstoneNew York199611329

6 

Clinical and laboratory institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 27th informational supplementM100https://clsi.org/media/1469/m100s27_sample.pdf

7 

A Jamatia D Roy R Shil P Prabhakar Bacteriological profile and antimicrobial resistance patterns isolates in pus samples at Agartala Government Medical CollegeAsian J Pharm Clin Res20171013357

8 

K Murugesan RS Radha H Vijayan Study on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing against Pyogenic Organisms from Wound InfectionsInt J Pharm Sci Rev Res20174512625

9 

R Kumar A Kumar UP Keshri M Gari SK Mahato P Protim Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of pus culture in a tertiary care hospital of Jharkhand, IndiaInt J Basic Clin Pharmacol201765118492

10 

S Mohanty A Kapil B Dhawan BK Das Bacterilogical and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of soft tissue infections from northern IndiaIndian J Med Sci2004581105

11 

V Singh PK Chauhan UA Bodh K Kaushal A Iqbal Isolation and antibiogram pattern of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus causing wound infectionInt J Anal Pharm Biomed Sci2012111821

12 

S Rai UN Yadav ND Pant JK Yakha PP Tripathi A Poudel Bacteriological Profile and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Bacteria Isolated from Pus/Wound Swab Samples from Children Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital in Kathmandu, NepalInt J Microbiol2017252908510.1155/2017/2529085

13 

RA Khanam MR Islam A Sharif R Parveen I Sharmin MA Yusuf Bacteriological Profiles of Pus with Antimicrobial Sensitivity Pattern at a Teaching Hospital in Dhaka CityBangladesh J Infect Dis201851104

14 

SN Gomatheswari T Jeyamurugan Bacteriological Profile and the Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Microorganisms Isolated from Pus/Wound Swab Isolates in Patients Attending a Tertiary Care Hospital in South IndiaInt J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci2017610140513

15 

P Bora P Datta V Gupta L Singhal J Chander Characterization and antimicrobial susceptibility of Coagulase-negative Staphylococci isolated from clinical samplesJ Lab Physicians20181044149

16 

H Sawdekar R Sawdekar V R Wasnik Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates from wound infection and their sensitivity to antibiotic agents at super specialty hospital, Amravati city, IndiaInt J Res Med Sci2017324339



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 10-12-2023

Accepted : 08-01-2024


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/ 10.18231/j.ijmmtd.2023.048


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 1017

PDF Downloaded: 283