Introduction
Blood stream infection (BSI) is a potentially life threatening infection, associated with high mortality and morbidity. Coagulase negative Staphylococci (CoNS) and Staphylococcus aureus are the most commonly isolated Gram positive bacteria from blood culture samples. S. aureus is a known pathogen causing BSIs, while CoNS were considered to be common contaminants of blood culture. CoNS are found to be the most frequent cause of nosocomial bloodstream infections.1 CoNS are a part of the normal microflora of skin but can also colonize the nasal mucosa, the lower airways and invasive devices.2 In clinical practice, it is important to distinguish between contamination and BSI to prevent unnecessary prescription of antimicrobial agents leading to a selection of antimicrobial-resistant organisms, longer hospitalization and increased costs.3 Mainly due to lack of a diagnostic reference standard for BSI, the clinical relevance of a single blood culture positive for CoNS is difficult to assess.4 True BSI is considered when at least 2 blood culture yield CoNS whereas contamination is assumed if only one of the two sets of blood cultures shows growth of CoNS.5 However, several studies reported that about one-third of patients with true BSI had only one positive blood culture and that contamination was possible even if two or more sets were positive. Recently many studies have challenged this traditional viewpoint, showing an increased recognition of CoNS as agents causing BSI. Resistance to antimicrobials in CoNS is increasing, especially the frequency of methicillin-resistant CoNS (MRCoNS) in hospitalized patients.6
Aim of this study was to determine the frequency of Coagulase Negative Staphylococci (CoNS) in Blood Stream Infection (BSI) among patients presenting to a tertiary health care super speciality Institute in North India. Objective of this study was to compare frequency of CoNS in ICU, IPD, OPD (of tertiary care hospital) and referral centres (outside the hospital) patients suffering from BSI including their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective hospital based study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow for a period of two years (January 2017-December 2018). After skin preparation with 70% alcohol and 2% iodine solution, 5-10 ml blood was collected by venepuncture and inoculated into blood culture bottles containing 50 ml brain heart infusion broth with sodium polyanetholesulphonate as an anticoagulant. On receiving blood samples from a total of 6498 patients from OPD, IPD and ICU departments were subjected to aerobic and anaerobic bacteria culture. Culture positive broth was subcultured on Blood Agar and MacConkey Agar to isolate different pathogens in pure culture. Pure cultured isolates were identified by Gram’s staining and conventional biochemical.7 Further differentiation of Staphylococcal isolates into Staphylococcus aureus and CoNS was done by using Deoxy- Ribonuclease agar, slide coagulase and tube coagulase tests. Staphylococcus aureus and CoNS isolates were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) on Mueller–Hinton agar with the following antibiotic discs (Oxoid and Sigma aldrich Laboratories) using the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method: penicillin (10 U), cefoxitin (30 μg), Erythromycin (15μg), Gentamicin (10 μg), Tetracycline (30μg), Doxycycline (30μg) Ciprofloxacin (5 μg), Levofloxacin (5μg), Clindamycin (2μg), Linezolid (30μg) and Chloramphenicol (30μg). An oxacillin disc (1 μg) was used to detect methicillin resistance. Sensitivity was read after incubation for 24 hrs at 35+2 ̊C. Isolates were regarded as sensitive, intermediate or resistant according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2018 guidelines.8, 9 AST patterns of isolates from ICU, IPD, OPD and from other referral centers of Lucknow were analyzed. The data generated in this study were subjected for statistical analysis with the help of appropriate bio-statistical tool (SPSS 16.0 Software for windows) for interpretation of significant outcome.
Result
During the study period, out of total 3284 samples in 2017 and 3214 in 2018, 663 (20.2%) and 595 (18.5%) were found to be culture positive respectively. All clinically suspected patients whether hospitalized or OPD of bacteremia were included in the present study. Of these, 35 patients were excluded (10 in 2017 and 25 in 2018) because of contamination during blood culture collection. The average patient age was 56+10 years; 58% were male and 42% were female. This finding was in accordance with Elzi et al. (2012) (60%), Raad et al. (2009) (63%) and Rewa et al. (2012) (54.8%).10, 11, 12 Amongst the isolated bacterial pathogens gram positive cocci were the predominant ones, 402 and 360 isolates in 2017 and 2018 respectively. Staphylococci were isolated from 636 (9.78%) patients (10.2% in 2017 and 9.2% in 2018). Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from 18.8% and CoNS from 81.2% of total Staphylococcal isolates. In comparison to 2017, there was decrease in the incidence of Coagulase negative Staphylococcus spp. in 2018 notably in the department of OPD, IPD and ICU. However, there was surge in the incidence of CoNS BSI in referral centre by 2%. There was no significant change in the incidence of BSI due to Staphylococcus aureus in 2017 to 2018.
Table 1
Distribution of Coagulase negative staphylococcus and Staphylococcus aureus in BSI in various departments
In the present study we did not find any significant difference among the frequency of CoNS as well as S.aureus among the patients attending OPD (p=0.06; p=0.32), Referral centres (p=0.7;p=0.7) or IPD (p=0.06;p=0.33) in 2017 and in 2018. However, we observed significant difference in the frequency of CoNS (p=0.002) in Intensive care unit patients, there was considerable decrease in the incidence of Coagulase negative staphylococcus isolates.
Among the 517 isolates, a 59.7% prevalence of MRCoNS was seen. An overall high prevalence of resistance to the non-β-lactam antimicrobials was observed including clindamycin, gentamicin, erythromycin and fluoroquinolone like ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin. All the isolates were uniformly susceptible to vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid. The MRCoNS showed a higher level of resistance to all non-β-lactam antimicrobials tested as compared to MSCoNS [Table 2]. The main public health problem associated with high mortality, longer hospitalization, and exorbitant treatment cost is antibiotic resistance. For effective analysis of bacteremia, the collection of blood cultures should precede empirical treatment and modified based on antibiotic susceptibility and resistance pattern. MRCoNS showed higher level of resistance to all non-β-lactam antimicrobials compared to MSCoNS with difference being statistically significant for Fluoroquinolones (63% vs 18%; p value < 0.0001, ϗ2 value = 79.11), aminoglycosides (51% vs 20%; p value <0.001, ϗ2 value = 38.275) and macrolides antibiotics like erythromycin (74% vs 28%; p value < 0.001; ϗ2 value = 88.32).
Table 2
Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility in MRCoNS and MSCoNS
MDR was present in 41.6% of the CoNS isolates (n = 215). Among the MRCoNS, MDR was found in 69.4%. This finding was in accordance with study conducted by Kumhar et al. (2002) and Jain et al. (2004) in North India.13, 14 Maximum number of MDR CoNS isolates were recovered from patients admitted to ICUs (85.67%) and minimum from those admitted to OPD and referral centres (28.2%). There was a significant difference (p value <0.05) among the isolates of MRCoNS isolated from ICU and IPD in 2017, However there was no statistical significance among MRCoNS isolates of ICU and IPD in 2018.
Discussion
Two decades back, Coagulase-negative Staphylococci were considered as contaminants of bacterial cultures. However, this group especially S. epidermidis has emerged as an important pathogen and a major cause of serious infections in ICU patients. In this study, S. epidermidis was the most common isolated member of CoNS. This was in agreement with prior reports conducted in adult ICUs and similar results have been shown by Usha MG et al. (2013) who studied the epidemiology from blood, pus, and urine isolates and showed that S. epidermidis was the most common isolate followed by S. haemolyticus and S. lugdunensis.15, 16
The prevalence of MRCoNS in our study ranged from 76% in 2017 to 70% in 2018 among total CoNS isolates. On PubMed search for Indian study on antibiotics resistance pattern of different CoNS species during the last 10 years, two studies were found – Asangi et al., 2011 and Singh S et al., 2016.,17, 18 Both the authors showed similar resistance high resistance to penicillin for Coagulase negative Staphylococcus; similar to our study. The high prevalence of MRCoNS not only decreases the treatment options and also assists in transfer of the resistance elements to other staphylococcal strains present in the hospital settings. The presence of methicillin resistance in CoNS has the potential or the ability to transfer resistance mechanisms to other virulent pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus present on the skin and environment. The rise of MRCoNS was higher in ICU patients because of the presence of comorbid conditions, parenteral nutrition and drug administration using intravascular devices.
Similar findings were observed in another study from India on neonatal septicaemia (Kumhar et al., 2002), although in that study, CNS was not a major isolate. Penicillin resistance was frequent (94%), while amikacin resistance was relatively rare (19%). Resistance to antibiotics was seen more in the methicillin-resistant isolates compared with those that were methicillin sensitive.
Table 3
Comparison between Referral centres (Outside hospital) and ICU regarding antimicrobial susceptibility in CoNS BSI cases.
The significance of CONS bacteremia should be evaluated better in light of clinical profile of the patient. High rates of methicillin resistance in our center in 2017 called for a better screening and infection control practices in 2018, which led to increase in susceptibility percentage of many antimicrobials in positive blood culture samples coming from ICU, IPD and OPD. However, this was not the case with the samples coming from referral centers as no health education or sample collection training was conducted at these centers as a result of which we observed rising trends of antimicrobial resistance in referral centers in the year 2018 also.
The most important factor for preventing nosocomial colonization and infections in an hospital is to practice hand hygiene in a best possible manner. It has been observed that the compliance to hand disinfection is often poor in OPD and referral centres due to inadequate health education programmes, in comparison to ICU and wards where monthly health education programme is conducted for best infection prevention practices, being lowest for the physicians working at OPD and outskirts settings, which further exposes these immunocompromised patients to colonization of resistant organisms like CoNS leading to BSI.
Conclusion
CoNS should be regarded as pathogen of significance and not as contaminant only. Various species such as S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, and S. lugdunensis are causing infections these days. MRCoNS prevalence is also increasing and was in the range of 50%–68.67% for various species in this study. 100% susceptibility was seen towards vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid. Still these drugs should be used as reserve drugs. To prevent CoNS infections, hospital infection control measures should be strengthened, and staff should be instructed to follow hand hygiene practice. Speciation of CoNS and its antibiotic susceptibility pattern will guide the clinicians in establishing their role as significant pathogens and initiate proper antimicrobial therapy based on the susceptibility pattern.
Article
DOI
